Panis
David
Roth
David Roth’s artistic practice forms a long-term research into the origins, processes and manifestations of painting. For Roth the process of making and the element of chance involved are as important to notice as the final visual outcome. Therefore a so called end product as for example a painted canvas and side products as for example a palette or a piece of cloth for cleaning brushes, have t...he same value for him. Every surface with marks and history of the process may turn up in his works. Time and duration are important elements and the layering of materials from different periods within one work can either spark dissonance or renewal. Roth’s works continually play with concepts of construction and deconstruction as well as with the performative and sculptural potential painting can possess. This becomes very clear in his painterly installations and in his intriguing and humorous videos that document the sometimes unusual making process of various of his ‘paintings’.
 
David Roth (1985, AT) graduated from the Academy of fine arts Vienna in the class of Daniel Richter. Recent solo and duo exhibitions include ‘Imagine’ at Bildraum 01 in Vienna, ’An introduction to painting’ at Dürst Britt & Mayhew, ‘remember’ at New Jörg in Vienna, ‘Vogl/Roth’ at Skulpturinstitut in Vienna, ‘ça grésille, ça clignotte’ at le commissariat in Paris and ‘Orgy Now’ at Ve.sch in Vienna. Recent group exhibitions include ‘Stretch Release’ at Dürst Britt & Mayhew, ‘Vielfalt’ at Landesmuseum Burgenland, ‘Imago Mundi’ at Belvedere Winterpalais in Vienna and ‘Plus jamais seul’ at Standards in Rennes. Work by Roth is held in private and public collections including the Landesmuseum Burgenland, the AkzoNobel Art Foundation, the Aksenov Family Foundation and the Luciano Benetton collection. David Roth lives and works in Vienna, Austria.

2024

Certain circumstances. Selected flowers, Jean Guillaume Panis, Rouen (FR) upcoming opening November 28th

Body building, Galeria Alegria, Barcelone (ES)

2023

Labour and Wait, Dürst Britt & Mayhew, The Hague (NL)

Plein Air, Graf+Zyx / TANK, Lower Austria (AT)

Solo booth Art Rotterdam, presenté par Dürst Britt & Mayhew, Rotterdam (NL)

2022

A History of Painting, Spark Expanded, presented by Dürst Britt & Mayhew, Vienne (AT)

Method Acting, Galeria Alegria, Barcelone (ES)

2021

Solo booth Art Cologne, Solo Booth, presented by Dürst Britt & Mayhew, Cologne (DE)

Imagine, Bildraum 01, 2021, Vienna (AT)

2020

Augensex, Dürst Britt & Mayhew, The Hague (NL)
Solo Booth Vienna Contemporary, presented by Dürst Britt & Mayhew, Vienne (AT)

2019

An Introduction to Painting, Dürst Britt & Mayhew, The Hague (NL) 2018 “somewhere elsewhere“, with Claire de Foucauld, Fortuna, Vienna (AT)

Vogl/Roth, with Christoph Vogelbauer, Skulpturinstitut Paulusplatz 5, Vienna (AT)

2017

Danse, with Claire de Foucauld, Kaeshmaesh, Vienna (AT)

Roth de Foucauld, with Claire de Foucauld, Kaeshmaesh , Vienna (AT) 2016 “Artist Statement“, Parallel, Vienna (AT)

2014

remember, New Jörg, Vienna (AT)

2012

Orgy Now, Ve.sch, Vienna (AT)

ça grésille, ça clignotte, with Kamen Stoyanov, le commissariat, Paris (FR)

2011

Ein bisschen Goethe, ein bisschen Bon Aparte, die Zentrale, Vienna (AT)

Window Shopping, Videopräsentation, Gabriele Senn Galerie, Vienna (AT)

Flucht nach Vorne, Academy of fine arts, Vienna (AT)

2010

quatre yeux voient plus que deux, Villa Arson, Nice (FR)

od a do b, with Dino Zrnec, at Kino Mosor, Zagreb (HR)

2024

True Colours, Kunstmuseum Den Haag, The Hague (NL)

2023

Earth – A collective landscape, Akzo Nobel Art Foundation, Amsterdam (NL)

Landscapes, Museum Schloss Moyland, Collection van der Grinten (DE)

Arco Madrid, presented by Galeria Alegria, Madrid (ES) 2022 “Draisine Derby“, curated by Beni Wyss, Basel (CH)

Art Düsseldorf, presented by Dürst Britt & Mayhew, (DE)

2021

Art Rotterdam, presented by Dürst Britt & Mayhew, (NL)

2020

NADA (New Art Dealers Alliance) FAIR, presented by Dürst Britt & Mayhew, online

Vèf Jaah!, Dürst Britt & Mayhew, The Hague (NL)

Art Rotterdam, presented by Dürst Britt & Mayhew, Rotterdam (DE)

2018

It takes one to know one, presented by David Eisl at Cité internationale des arts; Paris (FR)

Parallel Vienna, with Paul Beumer, Kristan Kennedy presented by Dürst Britt and Mayhew, Vienna (AT)

2017

Stretch Release, Dürst Britt & Mayhew, The Hague (NL)

2016

Parallel, Alte Post, Vienna (AT)

Vielfalt, Landesmuseum Burgenland (AT)

2015

Sabotage, Flat 1, Vienna Art week, Vienna (AT)

Map of the new art, Fondacione Giorgi Cini, Venice (IT)

imago mundi, Collection Luciano Benetton, Belvedere Winterpalais, Vienna (AT)

a likeness has blisters, it has that and teeth, Semperdepot, Vienna (AT)

2014

Parallel, Altes Zollamt, Vienna (AT)

Young Art Auction, Albertina, Vienna (AT)

VisionXsound, Graf+Zyx / TANK 203.3040.AT, Lower Austria (AT)

Das Medium, Inomo, Vienna (AT)

2013

Plus jamais seul, STANDARDS, Rennes (FR)

New Order, Graf+Zyx / TANK 203.3040.AT, Lower Austria (AT)

CB, ADDS DONNA, curated by Johanna Braun, Chicago (US)

2012

Vollbildmodus, Kunstpavillon Innsbruck, Tirol (AT)

threesome, k-r-a-s, Vienna (AT)

Various Artists, HHDM, Vienna (AT)

Sophistikation, Videopräsentation, dieAusstellungsstraße, Vienna (AT)

Museum Schloss Moyland (DE)

AKZO Nobel Art Foundation (NL)

Aksenov Foundation (RU)

Collection Luciano Benetton (IT)

Landesmuseum Burgenland (AT)

Private collections

Certain circumstances. Selected flowers. A solo exhibition by David RothCertain circumstances. Selected flowers. A solo exhibition by David Roth27/11/2024 - 07/02/2025Panis77 rue Jeanne d'Arc, Rouen (fr)
« Doing things with painting: an interview with David Roth »Par Sarah Tas
Sara Tas: Plein air painting was a nineteenth-century development that allowed the artist to leave his/her studio and – thanks to the invention of the paint tube – paint direct impressions of nature even in nature itself. In works like Ottenstein you seem to take this concept to its extremes [not painting in nature but letting nature itself work on the canvas]. Does your work indeed relate to this art-historical tradition? David Roth: I think my approach to art is often a tandem of seriousness combined with childlike playfulness, humour and the questioning of set rules. My projects in nature are a constant interplay of serious and comical endeavour. Plein Air painting happens - as the name suggests – in the open air, outdoors with natural light conditions. Plein Air brings to my mind stories about artists like Turner, Munch or Van Gogh: William Turner who had himself tied to a ship’s mast, to immerse himself into the experience of a storm on the open sea in the most immediate way before painting ‘Snow Storm - Steam Boat off a Harbour’s Mouth’ in 1842, Edvard Munch who deliberately left some of his paintings in the open, stating ‘It does them good to fend for themselves’, Vincent Van Gogh, who wandered the countryside with his easel, completing his paintings in the open air in any wind and weather or rather despite the weather. Bold and absurd at the same time. ST: By taking the canvas outside and literally dragging it through nature, you allow a painting to emerge as a ’natural product‘. In this way, are you also trying to question, or perhaps even eliminate, the role of the artist? At the same time, you turn the artist into a performer, is it still about painting? DR: The Austrian art theorist Andreas Spiegl, who I am very fond of, wrote about my work ‘Ottenstein‘ (2022): “Pictures can be painted, displayed, or hung on a wall and one can live with them to pursue a view of the world”. All the projects with canvases in nature I have made since 2009 are very much about partnering up with the canvas, going on journeys and adventures and letting things take their course. I like to quote a good old friend of mine by the name of Vincent Van Gogh, who said in one of his letters to his brother Theo: “And I believe the public will begin to say, deliver us from artistic combinations, give us back the simple field’. * That sounds almost like an invitation to do what I do when I go on field trips with my canvases. I understand the strict demarcations of different art movements and genres in the time in which they emerged, as a means of positioning themselves and I do not condemn that. My idea of art, however, does not mean I decide on a certain medium and understand the (once) set rules and boundaries as immovable. I am doing things with paint. I am doing things with painting. I am doing things with paintings. The root of my interest has always been and still is painting, but I reserve the possibility of expressing myself in other media through painting. Indeed, the act of painting always has a performative side even in the classical sense. When attempting to name something, it seems convenient and easier to categorise (it). But just as humans don‘t only show one nature in different situations and with different opposites, each art form also can be erratic, thus rendering precise categorisation impossible, especially when boundaries are blurred. Questions and ideas such as ‘What is painting?‘, ‘How does a canvas become a painting?‘, ‘What can a painting be?’, ‘Painting as artefact of an adventure‘, delineations of different media, genres and art movements that grow indistinct, the experience gained by spending
time with the canvas and seeing paint, material and external influences such as nature and weather as partners in the creation of a painting, have manifested themselves in me during years of making. ST: Ottenstein? Why is this work called Ottenstein? DR: Ottenstein is the name of a large lake as well as the Lower Austrian area surrounding it. I had been toying with the idea of turning a canvas into a raft and sail for a long time, but kept postponing it. When in 2022 I was ready to give it a go, Ottenstein sprang to mind instantly. Ottenstein is a place that is actually very dear to me. Already as a child I used to go fishing there with my father every summer. We rented a small wooden fishing boat and stayed on the water from very early in the morning, sometimes even before sunrise until late into the night to fish and be in nature. The day I set out for the Ottenstein project was rainy and very windy in the beginning, but soon calmed down while I hiked through meadows and forests by the lake for hours, dragging two canvasses behind me like a farmer would his harrow, very close to nature, that imprinted itself on the canvases. Later I transformed the two canvases into a raft, gliding over the water steered by the wind. I expected I would be on the water only for a few minutes, but the raft kept dancing on the water for hours. Night fell and it was pitch-dark, only the raft’s canvases were glowing. The light the photoluminescent paint I had used to prime the canvases emitted, attracted fish and I could feel them touching the raft’s underside. By attaching the sail, the second canvas, to the other canvas, I had ruled out having any control over the direction the wind might make the raft take. I was a tourist and a passenger in my own project. Back on the shore, the two canvases’ transformation made further progress: from a raft into a tent providing a place to sleep. ST: In Ottenstein you don‘t paint a landscape but have the landscape ‘paint’ itself, in your Flower Paintings you don‘t paint flowers but make the flowers paint. Is this inversion a way for you to get to the essence? DR: Using a motif not only as such but (also) as a painting tool is a very direct way of depiction - the motif ‘paints itself ‘ and I am responsible for the path we take. So, who is the author? I would call it a co-operation between me and the landscape or me and the bouquet of flowers in relation to the respective external situation that has an impact on the process or on our common path. The traces on the canvas, caused by the motif, the landscape, the bouquet of flowers itself painting the motif, the movement, any changes of direction and the path are directed by me or circumstances during the act of making. For me, there is something very primeval about it, which I find refreshing because it brings a certain lightness contrasting the ‘serious‘ references every painterly gesture carries. ST: How do you choose your flowers for the Flower Paintings? DR: It depends on the time of year and where I am, when I do Flower Paintings. The flowers in the current series are all wild flowers - either from the French or the Austrian countryside or from places a few minutes away from my studio in Vienna, near train and subway stations or abandoned construction sites. Ultimately, everything is about selective attention, about being aware of things that have been there all along but went unnoticed. It took me years to realise there is a wide variety of wild flowers close to my studio. ST: The Mud Paintings are made from nature for nature and you exhibited them in their natural environment, the forest. Are your Mud Paintings meant to last or to fade away
eventually? Can you give me an example of what you hope they mean or could mean to any animal encountering these works in their natural habitat? DR: The urge of documenting something and leaving it behind in caves or in nature arose already at a time when nature was not a place of recreation but human habitat. At a time when art was made without the concept of art even existing. At a time when any artistic gesture took place without reference to previous art. I assume the concept of art as we understand it today is intangible for animals. The question of what my mud-painted canvases represent for animals was not the motivation behind exhibiting them in the forest, though the idea, that they create an artefact capturing this moment in time of a human being and nature communicating, appealed to me. I created the Mud Paintings in the forest and exposed them to the weather for eight months where they became part of the environment. Now I am interested in displaying their status quo indoors. ST: How are the works you named ‘Brain’ constructed? Do you deliberately work on one installation and is each layer a continuation of the previous one? Or is it instead an accidental, random, organic accumulation developing over a longer period of time that says something about your work process in general and the wanderings of your mind? DR: The ‘Brains‘ are trestles piled high with painting. I build them from old stretcher frames. The body of a ‘Brain‘ is made from layers and layers of material, which can be canvasses and paintings cut from their frame, joined by pieces of fabric I used as a palette, a rag employed to clean brushes, scraps of canvas to test the quality of colour, a section of a painting I cut out because it did not work composition-wise, plastic foil that served as a palette or to protect the floor, terry cloth towels used to clean paint pots or the studio floor. Some of the material is produced as part of so-called menial preparatory or painterly tasks or generated as a by- product in the painting process. I see this kind of painting as the purest form of painting - albeit a form of painting that does not claim to be painting in the process of creation. This provokes a painterly freedom and lightness difficult or even impossible to achieve consciously. Layer upon layer on different trestles from different painting projects from entirely different periods of time and work. ST: You indicate that the ‘Painting Painting’ paintings are primarily about spontaneity and playfulness. Does this mean you also associate them with COBRA or Action Painting, or are you more concerned with letting go of these art-historical associations and being as free as possible as a painter? DR: My ‘Painting Painting‘ paintings are created by over-painting again and again over a long period of time. A canvas becomes a palette becomes a painting - and the painting turns palette again in a rhythm going on for years and years. Usually, after each painted layer, weeks, sometimes months go by until the surface of the oil paint is dry and the next layer will follow. Over the years, colour accumulates on the canvas in an almost sculptural manner, sometimes even extending beyond the edges. It is a playful and spontaneous approach to painting. Ultimately, art history will make its voice heard anyway and painterly vocabularies from different periods, movements and genres meet, that may never have had any temporal or formal relationship. _ Sara Tas is associate curator at the Van Gogh Museum, Amsterdam. *Letter 291, Vincent van Gogh to Theo van Gogh, between 4 and 9 December 1882. vangoghletters.org
« Essay for group show ‘Stretch Release’ at Dürst Britt & Mayhew (The Hague) »Par Lynne van Rhijn, 2017
“... we see the artist dragging a large framed canvas behind him as he walks over roads and through woods. He reaches a field overlooking a vast mountainous landscape, and stops walking to fully take in the experience of the soft light and the slightly hazy silver sunbeams, his canvas finally resting in the soft grass just behind him. Filmed from the back, Roth takes Caspar David Friedrich’s often referenced Wanderer above a Sea of Fog (c. 1818), and in a way thinks it through fully. Where Friedrich must have taken his Romantic experience of nature back to his studio, work out sketches, mix oils just right to depict what he’d experienced, Roth takes a canvas outside to let the painting itself live the experience.”
« How to do things with paint. On David Roth’s Painting, Christoph Bruckner, 2019 »Par Christoph Bruckner, 2019
“The conceptual is no longer in opposite to working freely unlike historic conceptual art dictated, but for Roth both complement each other in his endeavour of fundamental research of painting in as broad a spectrum as possible. This ought not to be understood as the rejection of a personal style - and not because lack of style might become exactly that - but rather as an eagerness to work with a variety of styles without confining oneself by preferences.“
« Who’s afraid of yellow, green and brown? – A guide to cooking by colours, based loosely on David Roth’s Flower Paintings“ »Par Jeanette Pacher, 2019
“In his recent conceptual painting series titled Flower Painting, David Roth links model, the painting instru- ment and resulting abstract pictorial subject in a very immediate way. Rather than depicting the bouquet at hand in a meticulous or, instead, a more expressive manner – let’s say something like Vincent van Gogh did in his still life series, Sunflowers in the late 1880s – David Roth uses the flowers themselves to paint abstract images that are, in fact, more closely connected to colour field painting. Just wilder, rougher, more immediate than, say, Mark Rothko’s or Barnett Newman’s monumental examples of this genre that exude an air of ‘the sublime’. According to the method of their production and to their appearance, Roth’s paintings thus represent a contemporary (would you now call that 4.0?) update of this genre.“
« David Roth’s Paintings Get to See the World »Par Patrick Werkner, 2019
“Once a painting even got to visit Austria‘s most famous art collection at the Kunsthistorische Museum, the Museum of Fine Arts in Vienna, where David Roth strolls through its suits of rooms with grand paintings from previous centuries with a canvas, primed in white and devoid of any artistic intervention or marks (“Museumsbesuch”/ Visit to the Museum). We cannot choose our family, Roth says, but the new family members should at least be introduced to their relations.”
« Die Blumen des Bildes »Par Andreas Spiegl, 2021
“How to describe David Roth’s »Flower Paintings« where flowers turn paint brushes? His flower paintings do not depict flowers but in fact come into being through their traces, by the impressions they leave be- hind. They are incorporated into the painterly process as both motif and instrument at the same time. By using flowers as paint brushes Roth defines his environment as a utensil, distinguishing an idea of reality which appears in his painting and as painting. He does not only paint but allows his motif to participate in the formation of its painting. There are flower paintings painted by and with flowers, like some kind of coproduction, we already encountered in earlier works by Roth. Remember those »tableaus« created by and on hikes, where Roth dragged canvases behind himself with the resulting traces »making« the pictures, self-portraits of a trail, the artist and the path he walked co-working? The paintings may appear »abstract«, yet the painting’s instruments are actually involved – wild flowers, »Fleurs Sauvages«, Roth picked in France or on the bank of the Danube, both motif and paint brush. Even his form vocabulary,
the lines and colour fields are evidence of a dialogue with the history of painting and reality’s »self-will«, persuaded to encode itself into the idea of art and intervening into the traditional division of roles between author and work. The process of formation begins if you like already with the »picking of brushes« indicating a time concept that begins pre-opus, locating the painting even when there is no trace of a picture.“
« Imagine at Bildraum Vienna »Par Andreas Spiegl, 2021
“When David Roth drags a canvas through the country(side) with the resulting scratches and traces finally creating a painting, painted by the road and by walking, it is apparent that at the basis of this work lies a process just as it does in »Thirty-four Figurative Paintings«, a monochrome painting shown at his exhibition »Imagine«. Roth painted it with ash, obtained from 34 figurative paintings he burned for this purpose. Many paintings become one morphed into another, a process where figurative painting is trans- formed into abstract, the previous figurativeness indeed figuring as the transformation’s evidence. One sees the colours neutralised to ash-grey, a paint application which makes the traces of the brush almost disappear, one painting that emerged from all these others yet hiding them. One does not see, what can no longer be seen, as we do not know, how these paintings looked like. »Imagine«, the show’s title, relates to the idea, the monochrome painting contains its transformed ancestors within itself, hidden from view and left to our imagination.”
« The Other Side of History »Par Andreas Spiegl, 2022
“David Roth’s “A History of Painting” presents a counter-story to this concept of history. The material for his “paintings” has its sole origin in the rags he used when painting (2008–2012). And they do not only document the colours he used, but all the processes involved in painting, the painterly day-to-day, so to speak: wiping off/away, cleaning, or amending of anything which was not to appear in a painting. Moreover, the painter’s rags derive from textiles, no longer used in everyday domestic life, like old dish- cloths, sheets etc., thus indicating both, the margins of the ordinary and the margins of painting. They represent all those moments, no history is interested in, the historically irrelevant and negligible, supposed to merely facilitate and accompany the milestones, but never be considered as such or as contributors.”
« Method Acting »Par Andreas Spiegl, 2022
“Each painting is more than its presence can reveal. The traces will only point out, that something has been caused to vanish. We see that something has become un-seeable. David Roth’s decision to use photoluminescent paint in his artworks follows those traces. This paint contains pigments with an afterglow effect in the dark. Usually, light brings out colours, here, it is the dark that makes the paints’ (after)glow. With each work looking different in light and in darkness, one painting actually contains a pair: The appearance of one makes the other disappear and vice versa. With the light changing, one sees, somet- hing is absent, has been hidden, nevertheless as an absence remaining there: The picture turns into a trace or scent, tempting to investigate a vision, recognizing one will never see everything. Something will always evade the seeing and seeing will cloak what is seen, what we beheld, though, inextricably linked to and bringing forth the unsighted. This is the traces’ paradox: Through revealing, it keeps hidden. On his explorations of nature David Roth tracked bark beetles, which eat their way through trees, leaving behind a trace, forming a pattern of paths carved into the wood, that looks like a drawing. A sign of death on the trees, drawn by death. Roth treats these trees as printing blocks, taking wood prints off them. The impressions preserve the tracks, Roth then transfers to wooden panels, now like the beetle (à la method acting) follows them in his woodworking, re-tracing the paths the beetles chose. This way, one trace leads to another, creating images that expose something, while also testament of something withheld, nature at the point of vanishing or turning into “nature morte”, a still life, the imprint indicating a life grown still. To pursue these trails lies in the eyes of the beholder, to see, what through seeing you cannot see (any longer).”
« Schlaflose Bilder / Paintings Sans Sleep »Par Andreas Spiegl, 2023
“Instead of picking up a canvas and paint to make landscapes, Roth decided, to put the canvas onto a leash and drag it behind him through all kinds of landscapes. In doing so, the former motif in a way metamorphoses into the brush leaving marks on the picture on the way through forests, snow and over mountains. The drag and scratch marks imprinted on these hikes created the final painting, not depicting but documenting and manifesting them. In this way, the painter transforms himself into an artist who lets nature and the landscape itself paint the picture of which it is to bear witness. The painting is no longer guided by the coordinates of likeness and perception it rather announces itself as a record of nature and a »natural product«. In lieu of painting, in »Nighthawk« (2021) Roth trails a canvas behind him through
a nocturnal forest, in lieu of painting a lake in a landscape in »Ottenstein« (2022) Roth trails a canvas through the surroundings and in »White on White« (2021) he confronts abstract and monochrome painting with a walk in the snow that transforms the landscape into the image of a winter landscape. David Roth uses video to document his painting forays, directing his eye not without irony and critique towards the question of the image and painting by employing canvasses as raft and sails gliding over the nocturnal lake or as a sledge racing through the snow from the mountaintop to the valley below. Whether painting, raft, sail, or sledge, all at once and just separated by terminology Roth’s landscape paintings defy these conventions. Here, painting is not merely about painting a picture, but raises the question of painting as such.”